|


|
REPRINTED FRDM
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS
1828
PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO
80302
|

|
Dr. Corbett is in the private practice of
orthodontics at 1 E. Carmel Valley Road, Carmel Valley, CA 93924. |
|
Slow and
Continuous Maxillary Expansion, Molar Rotation, and
Molar Distalization |
|
An estimated 25-30% of
all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary expansion, and
95% of Class
II cases can be improved by molar rotation, distalization, and
expansion. Rapid palatal expanders such as the Haas and the Hyrax
have traditionally been used for treating transverse maxillary
discrepancies, but these appliances will not rotate or distalize
molars.
Furthermore, rapid
palatal expansion has been shown to produce forces ranging from 3 to
more than 20 pounds. Studies have documented free-floating bone
fragments, bleeding, microfractures, cyst formation, vascular
disorganization, and connective tissue inflammation in suture sites
during rapid expansion.
Story and
Ekstrom have suggested that slow expansion procedures allow
physiologic adjustments and reconstitution of the sutural elements
over a period of about 30 days. McAndrews demonstrated that the
application of light, continuous forces in areas of periosteal
growth allows normal arch dimensions to develop at any age without
undue tipping of the abutment teeth. Increased fibroblastic,
osteoclastic, and osteoblastic activity seems to occur when the
maxilla is widened slowly. Slower expansion has also been associated
with more physiologic stability and less potential for relapse than
with rapid expansion. The neuromuscular adaption of the mandible to
the maxilla in slow expansion allows a normal vertical closure.
This article will introduce a fixed-removable
nickel titanium appliance, the Nitanium Palatal Expander2* (Fig. 1),
that delivers a uniform, slow, continuous force for maxillary
expansion, molar rotation and distalization, and arch development.
This appliance expands at a rate that maintains tissue integrity
during repositioning and remodeling of the teeth and bone. In other
words, as the palate expands, regeneration matches the rate of
expansion.
The action of the NPE2 is made possible by
harnessing nickel titanium's properties of shape memory and
transition temperature. Shape memory is the ability to constantly
return to a set shape after deformation. Nickel titanium can be
alloyed to produce a metal with a specific thermal transition
temperature in the case of the NPE2, 94°F. At temperatures higher
than the transition temperature, interatomic forces bind the atoms
more tightly, producing a stiffer metal. At lower temperatures, the
forces weaken, making the metal quite flexible.
|
|
*Nitanium is a
registered trademark and Palatal Expander2 and Molar Rotator2
are trademarks of Ortho Organizers, Inc., 1619 S. Rancho Santa
Fe Road, San Marcos, CA 92069. |

Fig. 1 Nitanium Palatal Expander2.
|
The NPE2 delivers a
force of 350g in 3mm increments. If a 4mm expansion appliance is
placed, the force will initially be higher, but will return to
350g once 3mm of expansion has occurred. Because the force
application is preprogrammed, it is self-limiting. Neverthless,
slight adjustments can be made by the clinician at any time to
constrict the appliance or add further expansion. |
|
Appliance Design and Selection
The NPE2
incorporates an innovative lingual attachment with .036"
Ortholoy arms and molar loops for unilateral and bilateral
adjustments (Fig. 2). A locking indentation in the lingual
attachment fastens the appliance securely to the maxillary molar
band. To prevent removal or accidental dislodging, the appliance
should also be tied in with ligatures.
The vast majority
of palatal expansion patients need at least 4mm of expansion at
the maxillary first molars (2mm per side). An additional 2-3mm
can be gained by adjusting the palatal Nitanium loop of the
NPE2. If more than 8mm of expansion is needed, two separate
expanders may need to be used in sequence. If the molars are too
severely rotated to place an expander, a Nitanium Molar Rotator2
should be used prior to the NPE2.
|

Fig. 3 Mandibular arch width measured between tips of
distobuccal first molar cusps. |

Fig. 4
Maxillary arch width measured between central pits of first
molars.
|
|
The NPE2 is
available in 10 sizes, from 26mm to 44mm in 2mm increments. The
size of the expander is selected by one of the following two
methods:
1. With the
patient's mandibular first molars in normal position, measure
the arch width between the tips of the right and left
distobuccal cusps (Fig. 3). Now measure the arch width between
the central pits of the maxillary right and left first molars
(Fig. 4). The difference between these two measurements is the
amount of expansion required. Measure the distance between the
right and left maxillary first molars from the lingual surfaces
where the sheaths will be placed (Fig. 5). Add this value to the
required expansion. The total will indicate the size of NPE2 to
use, allowing for the prescribed expansion plus 1.5-2mm of
overcorrection to compensate for the combined width of the band
material, cement, and lingual sheaths.
2. Measure across the mandibular arch between the central
pits of the first molars (Fig. 6), then subtract 4mm to
determine the size of NPE2 to use. |

Fig. 5 Mandibular arch width measured between sites of lingual
sheaths. |

Fig.
6 Mandibular arch width measured between central pits of first
molars. |
|
Appliance
Preparation and Placement
1. After adequate
separation, fit and place bands, with lingual sheaths attached,
on the maxillary first molars.
2. Remove the
bands, and assemble the NPE2 and the bands as one passive unit,
securing the appliance to the bands with ligature wire (Fig. 7).
3. For patient education or for adjustment of the Ortholoy wire,
the molar loops, or the Nitanium wire, a trial fitting can be
done prior to cementation. Modifications of 1-2mm can be made
to the Nitanium wire to increase or decrease the amount of
expansion, and individual adjustments to the molar loops can be
made as needed (Fig. 8).
4. For best
results, use a triple-cure glass ionomer cement. Mix the
cement, place the cement in the bands, and spray the entire
surface of the Nitanium wire with
a tetrafluoroethane refrigerant spray, which will make the
appliance dead soft for easy placement (Fig. 9).
|

Fig. 7 NPE2 tied
to molar band with ligature wire. |

Fig. 8 Molar loop
adjusted with plier. |
|
5. Seat one band
completely, then seat the other band. Immediately cure the
cement for 15 seconds per side initially, then for an
additional 25 seconds per side to ensure a complete set (Fig.
10). |
|

Fig. 9 Nitanium wire
softened with refrigerant spray for placement. |

Fig.
10 Light-curing of cement. |
|
As the mouth begins
to warm the nickel titanium, the wire will stiffen, and the
shape memory will be restored. The expander will begin to exert
a low, continuous force against the teeth and the midpalatal
suture (Fig. 11). The patient should be instructed to sip a cold
fluid as needed to relieve the slight pressure. Do not use an
appliance that expands more than 4mm at one time, because with
the molar bands and sheaths,
the expansion will
actually be about 6mm.
|
|

Fig. 11 NPE2 after
initial placement. |

Fig. 12 NPE2 as
passive retainer after completion of expansion. |
|
TABLE 1 USUAL LENGTH OF TREATMENT (MONTHS) |
| |
Expansion |
Retention |
Primary Dentition
Mixed Dentition |
1-2 (sometimes less)
2-3 (depending on severity) |
2
2 |
Young Adults
Adults |
3
5 or more
(depending on age) |
2
3 |
|
|
Expansion is
normally completed in two to four months (Table 1). The
appliance should then be left in place for two to three months
of passive retention (Fig. 12). |
|
An 11-year-old
female presented with maxillary constriction and a Class II,
subdivision right malocclusion with a mesially rotated
maxillary right first molar. She had retained primary teeth, an
ectopically erupting maxillary cuspid, and an open bite (Fig.
13).
Measuring the arch
as described above indicated a need for 4mm of palatal expansion and a size 36 NPE2,
with additional rotation placed in the molar loop on the
maxillary right side (Fig. 14).
The desired
expansion was achieved in less than three months (Fig. 15). The
appliance was left in place for another three months of
retention and tooth eruption, after which the patient was
scheduled for full fixed appliance therapy for final detailing
(Fig. 16). The palatal expansion occured without anterior
spacing and without undue separation of
the bony segments, allowing osteoblastic activity to keep up
with sutural remodeling. |

|
Fig. 13 Case 1.
11-year-old female before treatment. |

|
Fig. 14 Case 1.
Palatal x-ray and NPE2 at initial placement. |

|
Fig. 15 Case 1. After three months of expansion. |
|
Fig. 16 Case 1. After three months of passive retention. |
|
Case
2
A IO-year-old
female presented with a Class I malocclusion with maxillary
constriction, an open bite, and a fingersucking habit (Fig. 17).
She needed 4mm of
expansion and a size 34 NPE2 (Fig. 18).
First-phase treatment objectives of expanded archform, space
for cuspid
eruption, and bite
closure were achieved in four months (Fig. 19). The appliance
was removed, and the case was allowed to settle with a Nance
button retainer until full eruption, when detailing will be
completed. The NPE2 could have been left passively in place to
help intrude the molars and close the bite. X-rays showed an
expanded palate with the suture intact and minimal tipping.
|

|
Fig. 17 Case 2. 10-year-old female before treatment. |

|
Fig. 18 Case 2. Palatal x-ray and NPE2 at initial placement. |
|
Fig. 19 Case 2. After four months of expansion. |
|
Additional Functions of the NPE2
When the NPE2 is
first placed, the Ortholoy arms will not contact the bicuspids
(Fig. 20A). As. soon as the molars rotate, move distally l-3mm,
and expand, the arms will touch the bicuspids (Fig. 20B). The
appliance initially appears to move palatally, but as it
expands, it will move occlusally. This will produce a lower
tongue posture that can promote expansion and transverse growth
in the mandibular arch (Fig. 21).
The NPE2 also frees
the growth restriction of posterior functional crossbite and
provides
space for impacted canines. At first, the movement will be
orthodontic, but after expansion of the molars is achieved,
there will be orthopedic changes in the
maxilla and often mandibular repositioning as well. |

|
Fig. 20 A.
Ortholoy arms do not contact
bicuspids at initial placement. B. After molar expansion,
distal rotation, and distalization, Ortholoy arms contact
bicuspids. |

Fig. 21 Lower tongue posture can promote expansion and transverse growth in mandibular arch. |

Fig. 22 NPE2 used as stabilizing wire for molar intrusion. |

Fig. 23 Buccal root torque added after expansion. |
|
After expansion,
the NPE2 can act as a stabilizing wire for molar intrusion
(Fig. 22), or provide buccal root
torque if the distal end (the wire inserted into the lingual
sheath) is torqued with a plier (Fig. 23).
Other specialized
uses:
. Unilateral molar
correction (Fig. 24).
. Unilateral
posterior crossbite correction (Fig. 25).
. Bilateral or
unilateral contraction with smaller appliance sizes (Fig. 26).
. Distal rotation and
expansion of both the first
molars and
second bicuspids (Fig. 27).
. Distal rotation and
expansion of the molars and second bicuspids, followed by
initial cuspid retraction
(Fig. 28).
. Leveling,
alignment, and rotation of the incisors while the buccal
segments are expanded a fixed, three-way
sagittal appliance (Fig.
29).
.
Leveling, alignment, and rotation of the
buccal segments while the molars are expanded and the incisors
are retracted (Fig. 30).
. Retention of
expansion while the incisors are advanced (Fig. 31).
.
Overexpansion of the palatal Nitanium loop in
cleft palate cases (Fig. 32).
|
|

Fig. 24 Unilateral
molar correction. |

Fig. 25 Unilateral
posterior crossbite correction. |
|
Fig.
26 Bilateral or unilateral contraction with smaller appliance size.
|
|

Fig. 27 Distal
rotation and expansion of first molars and second bicuspids. |

Fig. 28 Distal
rotation and expansion of first molars and second bicuspids,
followed by initial cuspid retraction. |
|

Fig. 29 Leveling,
alignment, and rotation of incisors while buccal segments are
expanded
(fixed, three-way sagittal appliance). |

Fig. 30 Leveling,
alignment, and rotation of buccal segments while molars are expanded and incisors are retracted. |
|
Conclusion
Advantages of the
Nitanium Palatal Expander2 over traditional rapid palatal
expanders include:
. Better physiologic
response and stability.
. Preprogrammed to
deliver the exact amount of expansion required and to stop at
that point.
. No severe suture
splitting.
. Less tipping of
abutment teeth.
. Can influence the
direction of maxillary and mandibular growth.
. Rotates molars buccally
or distally.
. Can be used for
anchorage.
. Shorter retention
period.
. Placed at the chair,
without laboratory procedures.
. Individually adjustable
molar loops.
. Does not require
frequent operator or patient adjustments.
. Built-in safety
retention system.
. Less patient
discomfort.
. Allows the patient to
adjust the wire temperature to mitigate pressure.
. Less effect on speech
and eating.
. Hygienic. |
|

Fig. 31 Retention
of expansion while incisors are advanced. |

Fig. 32
Overexpansion of Nitanium loop in cleft palate case. |
|
1. McNamara; J.A. Jr.
and Brudon, W.L.: Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the
Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1995.
2. Ten Hoeve, A.:
Palatal bar and lip bumper in non-extraction treatment, J. Clin. Orthod.
19:272-291, 1985.
3. Haas, AJ.: Rapid expansion of the
maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by
opening the mid-palatal
suture, Angle Orthod.31:73-90,1961.
4. Haas, AJ.: The
treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the mid-palatal
suture, Angle Orthod.
35:200-217, 1965.
5. Haas, AJ. Palatal
expansion: Just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics, Am.
J. Orthod.
57:219-255, 1970.
6. Bishara, S.E. and
Stanley, R.N.: Maxillary expansiom Clinical implications,
Am. J. Orthod.
91:3-14,198
7.
Hicks, E.P.: Slow maxillary expansion: A clinical study of the skeletal vs.
dental response to low
magnitude force, Am. J. Orthod.
73:121-141, 1978.
8. Story, E.: Tissue
response to the movement of bones, Am. J. Orthod.
64:229-247, 1973.
9. Ekstrom, e.; Henrikson, e.O.; and
Jensen, R.: Mineralization in the midpalatal suture after orthodontic
expansion, Am. J. Orthod.
71:449-455,1977.
10. McAndrew, J.R.: The
continuous force control system, Lancer Technical
Report, Lancer Pacific,
Carlsbad, CA, 1985.
11.
Henry, RJ.: Slow maxillary expansion: A review of quad-helix therapy during
the transitional dentition, J.
Dent. Child.,
November-December 1993, pp. 408-413.
12. Bell, R.A. and LeCompte, EJ.: The effects of maxillary expansion using a
quad-helix appliance during the
deciduous and mixed dentition,
Am. J. Orthod. 79:152-161,1981.
13. Bell, R.A.: A review
of maxillary expansion in relation to rate of expansion and
patient's age, Am. J.
Orthod. 81:32-37,1982.
14. Corbett, M.C.: Molar
rotation and beyond, J. Clin. Orthod. 30:272-275,
1996.
15. McConnell, T.L. et
al.: Maxillary canine impaction in patients with transverse
maxillary deficiency, J.
Dent. Child., May-June 1996, pp.
190-195. |
Ortho Organizers Pty Ltd

PO Box 478
Sylvania Southgate NSW 2224 Australia |