|


|
REPRINTED FROM
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS
1828
PEARL STREET, BOULOER, COLORADO
80302 |
|
Treatment of Class
II,
Division 2
Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations |
|
FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS,
PHD |
|

Dr. Uribe |

Dr. Nanda |
Dr. Uribe is an Assistant
Professor and Dr. Nanda is university of
Connecticut Orthodontics Alumni Endowed
Chair, Professor, and Head, Department of
Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine,
University of Connecticut Health Center,
Farmington, CT 06032. E-mail Dr. Nanda at
nanda@nso.uchc.edu |
|
Treatment of Class II malocclusion in
adolescents has always relied on growth
modification. The majority of treatment
modalities, such as functional appliances,
are directed at stopping or redirecting
maxillary growth simultaneously stimulating mandibular growth. On the other hand, in
adult patients with severe Class II
malocclusions, generally involving extremely
deficient mandibles, orthognathic surgery is
often the only possible treatment.
Although camouflage may be attempted by
extracting premolars, the soft-tissue
objectives may be impossible to meet. Even
so, a recent study has shown that patient
satisfaction with camouflage treatment was
similar to that achieved with surgical
mandibular advancement. In Class II patients
with mild-to-moderate skeletal
discrepancies, dental compensation may well
be the treatment of choice. Common treatment
procedures for such patients include flaring
of incisors, interproximal tooth reduction,
and extractions.
Treatment of an adult Class II patient
requires careful diagnosis and a treatment
plan involving esthetic, occlusal, and
functional considerations. The treatment
objectives must include the chief complaint
of the patient, and the mechanics plan
should be individualized based on the
specific treatment goals.
At the University of Connecticut, we have
designed multifunctional orthodontic wires
capable of simultaneously performing
different orthodontic tooth movements.
Because both the force system and the side
effects of these "smart" wires are now well
understood, we can usually avoid the need
for headgear and Class II elastics.
This article describes our treatment of
Class II, division 2 adult patients
requiring premolar extractions. Division 2
cases are often characterized by severe deep
bites, lingually inclined upper central and
lower incisor, and labially flared maxillary
lateral incisors. These patients also tend
to exhibit problems with the upper and lower
occlusal planes, such as deep curves of Spee.
The soft-tissue drape of the lips often
conforms to the malocclusion, so that the
lips may be redundant with a deep
mentolabial sulcus. Because of the deep bite
and supraeruption of the maxillary incisors,
the gingival margins of the maxillary
anterior teeth are usually malaligned, and
the lingually inclined mandibular incisors
may have excessively high gingival margins
(Fig 1).
|

Fig. 1 A. Smile displaying unesthetic gingival margin
heights.
B. Gingival margin height discrepancy in anterior segments
commonly found in Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
The treatment
protocol for these patients includes extraction of upper
premolars to relieve crowding, with simultaneous correction
of the deep bite by intrusion of the upper and/or lower
incisors. Intrusion mechanics are performed with either a
preformed nickel titanium Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA)
or CNA beta titanium arch- wires. Space closure is
accomplished with CNA mushroom-loop wires or CNA T-Ioops.
|
Intrusion Archwires
Preformed CIA nickel titanium intrusion
wires deliver a force of 35-40g in patients
with average arch length and a full
complement of teeth. Short CIA wires are
used in extraction cases where spaces have
already been closed, and long wires are used
in non-extraction cases.
The length of the wire is determined by the
location of the moment bent into it. For
ideal force activation, the bend should be
3-5mm mesial to the first molar auxiliary
tube when the wire
is inserted (Fig.
2).
To produce higher
force
levels of 50-60g, which might be desirable
in some adult patients, preformed CNA beta
titaniurn archwires can be activated by
placing moment bends in front of the molar
tubes. The bends can be increased or
decreased to vary the magnitude of force. |

Fig. 2 Intrusion arch produces
anterior tip back moment and intrusive force
along with extrusive force on molars. |

▲=
Ligation Points
Fig. 3 Force system and ligation
points of intrusion arch in Class II, division
2 malocclusion.
|
|
 |
|
Fig. 4 Canine retraction
generates extrusive effect on incisors.
To counteract this tendency, intrusion
arch is tied anteriorly. |
|
Fig. 5
Canine
retraction with .016" x .022" stainless steel base arch
and overlay intrusion arch for anchorage
and incisor control.
The anterior
portion of the intrusion arch is tied to an anterior
segment in the incisor brackets (usually .017" x .025"
stainless steel), depending on the anteroposterior
dental objectives. One of the multifunctional aspects of
intrusion wires is that they can be used for flaring the
incisors when needed. Because the upper central incisors
are lingually inclined in Class II, division 2 patients,
the intrusion arch should not initially be cinched
distal to the molar tubes, so that the incisors can be
flared prior to their intrusion (Fig. 3). The wire can
then be cinched back 2-3mm distal to the molar tubes for
intrusion of the incisors. It is also important to
ligate the intrusion arch initially to the anterior
segment between the two central incisors. This allows
the point of attachment of the wire to be as anterior as
possible in relation to the incisors center of
resistance. Once the incisor root inclinations have been
corrected, the intrusion arch can be ligated to the
anterior segment at the two lateral incisors and between
the central incisors.
|
Canine
Retraction Mechanics |
After
intrusion of the incisors, the anterior teeth can be
retracted in one of two ways: en masse retraction of the
six anterior teeth, or a two-step procedure involving
canine retraction followed by retraction of the four
incisors. In this article, only the two-step method will
be described.

Fig. 6 Moment at molar counteracts mesial reactive force
in anchor unit.
|
A stainless steel base arch
wire is used to slide the canines distally. To
prevent the incisor bite from deepening due to
the change in inclination of the canines (Fig.
4), an intrusion arch can be tied over the
stainless steel wire (Fig. 5).The intrusion arch
is ligated at the level of the lateral incisors
and between the central incisors, delivering a
distal crown tip back moment on the molars to
effectively control the loss of distal anchorage
often associated with sliding mechanics (Fig.
6). These mechanics are ideal for cases where
anchorage is critical and, in adults, can
eliminate the need for headgear or Class II
elastics. With an intrusive force on the
incisors and a moment on the molars, the base
arch wire will not deflect too much, as is often
seen in sliding mechanics due to the friction
generated by canine retraction. |
Fig. 7 A. Mushroom-loop archwire without preactivation
bends. B. Archwire with gable bends mesial and distal to
archwire. C. 3mm preactivation of loop.
|
Fig. 8 .017" x .025" CNA mushroom-loop archwire
after intraoral activation. |
|
Mushroom-Loop Space-Closing Archwires
At this stage, in the
majority of patients, the four incisors either
need translation or controlled differential
movement of their crowns and root apices. For
translatory movement, a high, constant
moment-to-force ratio of approximately 10:1 is
recommended. If the ratio is too low, as is
common with straightwire mechanics, the incisor
crowns will move lingually, reducing the overjet
and giving an erroneous impression of a
tooth-size discrepancy when the spaces distal to
the lateral incisors appear to be enormous. To
correct this side effect, either the bite must
be
reopened or the incisors must be torqued,
creating an unnecessary stress at the root
apices as well as lengthening the treatment
time.
The preformed mushroom-loop space-closing
archwire produces an ideal moment-to-force
ratio. The mushroom shape of the loop will not
interfere with the gingival tissue, and an
activated loop will not become distorted, thus
improving force delivery. For .022" brackets, an
.017" x .025" CNA archwire comes preformed with
the mushroom loops at standardized distances of
2646mm in increments of 2mm (Fig. 7 A). This
measurement represents the distance between the
distal surfaces of the lateral incisors across
the midline.
Once the proper archwire has been selected,
it is preactivated outside the mouth to achieve
the proper moment-to-force ratio. First, the
legs of both mushroom loops are carefully
separated by about 3mm. Additional gable bends
may be placed mesially as needed to increase the
anterior moment (torque), and distal to the
mushroom loop to increase the anchorage moment
(Fig. 7B). Next, the torque on the distal legs
is eliminated. The arch wire is then placed in
the mouth and engaged across the arch from first
molar to first molar (Fig. 8). Another lmm of
activation is added, for a total of 4mm. |
|
Fig. 9 A. Mushroom-loop archwire with spaces
closed. Wire is left in place for another six
weeks to allow residual moments to deliver
proper axial root inclinations. B. Same patient
with ideal axial inclinations. |
|
The loop should not be
reactivated until at least 3mm of space has been
closed, thus maintaining a more constant
moment-to-force ratio. After the spaces are
completely closed, the wire should be left in
the mouth for one or two additional visits, so
that the residual moments can be used to correct
the axial root inclinations of the anterior and
posterior teeth (Fig. 9A). This completely
eliminates the need for root uprighting and
torquing springs and significantly shortens
treatment time. |
|
The finishing phase of
treatment simply involves the use of co-ordinated
.017" x .025" or .018" x .025" CNA wires. Minor
bends can be placed in these beta titanium wires
for detailing the alignment and occlusion. The
finishing stage is usually short because of the
correct positioning of the incisors after
retraction (Fig. 9B).
In adult patients, a maxillary modified
Hawley wraparound retainer is ideal, because
there is no interference in the occlusion. A
lower bonded 3-3 retainer is recommended. It is
important to emphasize that intrusion is a
stable movement; minor overbite relapse should
be expected, however, since its correction does
involve some posterior buccal extrusion.
|
|
Case Report
A
26-year-old female presented with the chief
complaint of "my teeth stick out" (Fig. lOA).
She had a moderately convex hard and soft-tissue
profile because of a retrusive mandible. A Class
II, division 2 malocclusion was associated with
a severe overjet and 100% deep bite due to
moderately supraerupted upper incisors and
excessively supraerupted lower incisors. The
upper incisors were upright, and the lower
incisors normally inclined. Both arches
exhibited mild-to-moderate crowding.
The
treatment objective in this case was to maintain
the hard and soft-tissue profiles. In the
vertical dimension, the goal was to intrude the
maxillary incisors to improve the lip-to-incisor
relationship and achieve a flat occlusal plane.
The lower incisors needed to be intruded
slightly, but extrusion of the posterior buccal
segments was undesirable. In the anteroposterior
dimension, the
treatment objectives were to maintain the upper
incisor crown positions and move the roots
lingually. The lower incisors required minor
intrusion as well as flaring. The molar
positions, arch width, and midlines needed to be
maintained. |
Fig. 10 A. Adult patient with nearly full-cusp Class II
molar relationship. Note inclination of incisors, 100%
deep bite, and discrepancy in gingival margins between
canines and incisors. B. After initial intrusion phase
(note incisor level and molar tip back), .016" x .022"
stainless steel base arch is used with short .017" x
.025" nickel titanium intrusion arch to retract canines.
C. Canines fully retracted into Class I positions. Note
intrusion, overbite, and anchorage control without
elastic wear. D. .017" x .025" mushroom-Ioop archwire
with pre activation bends activated about 4mm for
translatory incisor retraction. Archwire was not
reactivated for about 10 weeks. E. Finished occlusion,
showing excellent anchorage control, overbite
correction, and anterior incisor angulation.
|
The
upper first premolars were extracted to relieve
crowding. An .017" x.025" nickel titanium intrusion
arch was placed to simultaneously flare and intrude
the upper incisors. Group A anchorage (critical) was
maintained with the intrusion arch during cuspid
retraction, using sliding mechanics on an .016 x
.022" stainless steel arch wire (Fig. lOB, C). The
mushroom loops in an .017" x .025" CNA arch wire
were preactivated as described above (Fig. lOD).
Posterior moments in the mushroom-loop archwires
helped maintain anchorage during upper incisor
retraction.
The mandibular crowding was resolved by
aligning the lower arch. Finishing was accomplished
in two visits with co-ordinated upper and lower
.017" x .025" CNA beta titanium archwires (Fig. lOE).
|
|
Conclusion
Treatment of Class II, division 2
malocclusion in adults is always challenging.
Applying sound biomechanical principles to execute
the mechanics plan is the surest way to achieve
predictable results with minimal side effects. The
appliance shown in this article is versatile enough
to be applied in a variety of situations with only
minor alterations. By using the biomechanical
concepts presented here and a set of archwires
designed with specific objectives in mind, the
clinician can achieve the desired goals.
|
|
1.
Staley, R.: Etiology and prevalence of malocclusion,
in Textbook of Orthodontics, ed. S. Bishara,
W.E.
Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 2001, p. 83.
2. Baccetti, T.; Franchi, L.; McNamara, J.A; and
Tollaro, I.: Early dentofacial features of' Class II
malocclusion: A longitudinal
study from the deciduous through the mixed
dentition, Am. J. Orthod.
111:502-509, 1997.
3.
McNamara, J.A.: Components of Class II malocclusion
in children 8-10 years of age, Angle Orthod.
51:177-202, 1981.
4. Mihalik,C.A.; Proffit, W.R.; and Phillips, C.:
Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with
orthodontic camouflage: A comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes, Am. J. Orthod.
123:266-278, 2003.
5. Nanda, R.: Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies
in Clinical Orthodontics, ed. R Nanda, in press,
W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.
6.
Kuhlberg, A. and Glynn, E.: Treatment planning
considerations for adult patients, Dent. Clin. N.
Am.
41:17-28, 1997
7. Nanda, R.: Correction of deep overbite in adults,
Dent. Clin. N. Am. 41:67-88,1997.
8.
Nanda, R.; Marzban, R.; and Kuhlberg, A: The
Connecticut Intrusion Arch, J. Clin. Orthod.
32:708-715, 1998.
9.
Smith, R.I. and Burstone, C.I.: Mechanics of tooth
movement, Am. J. Orthod. 85:294-307, 1984.
10. Burzin, J. and Nanda, R.: The stability of deep
overbite correction, in Retention and Stability
in Orthodontics, ed. R. Nanda
and C.J. Burstone, WB. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993,
p. 61.
11. Nanda, R: Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics,
ed. R Nanda, WB. Saunders Co., Philadelphia,
1997. |
Ortho Organizers Pty Ltd

PO Box 478
Sylvania Southgate NSW 2224 Australia |